via Journal of Indo-Pacific Archaeology, December 2021: A paper by Perston et al. on recent research in <a href="https://www.southeastasianarchaeology.com/tag/south-sulawesi/">South Sulawesi</a>, with summaries of research in Indonesian publications. <blockquote>The central Indonesian island of Sulawesi has played an important role in modern and pre-modern human migration through the Southeast Asian island chain. Over the last two decades, archaeological excavations in South Sulawesi have provided new insights into the ancient hu-man past of this region, in particular the exten-sive Mid-Holocene or “Toalean” sites, as well as several significant Pleistocene-age discoveries. This paper assesses the latest research and what implications these works have for prior models of human prehistory in the region. We show that recent studies have revealed that Toalean-era toolmakers were able to adapt to different envi-ronments and raw material sources, but would also transport desired raw materials for produc-tion of certain artifact types. Early quarry sites have also been identified for the first time. In ad-dition, new excavations have revealed complex tool forms in forested highland environments, previously thought to hold only sparse and ele-mentary assemblages, allowing us to reassess 20th century models of Toalean cultural sub-groups and distribution. The rich parietal art in-itially attributed to the Toalean has now been dated to the Late Pleistocene, roughly contempo-raneous with the production of “portable art”—the existence of which was also recently revealed—in this region, while lithic artifacts dated to between at least 194–118 thousand years ago at Talepu appear to predate modern Homo sapiens occupation. Two newly reported highland sites have also yielded rich and deeply stratified archaeological deposits. These may of-fer the best opportunity to test hypotheses such as the transitional “Ceramic Toalean” contact phase, as site disturbance and subsidence have formerly compromised the stratigraphic integrity of most excavations. This review shows that, while much work is still needed—particularly in obtaining a reliable body of well-stratified and reliable dates—recent research presents an im-age of early innovation in the region in the form of Late Pleistocene “art” production and Mid-Holocene technological developments that are both earlier and more extensive than previously known.</blockquote> Source: <em><a href="https://journals.lib.washington.edu/index.php/JIPA/issue/viewIssue/1155/139">View Issue</a></em>
